Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

i know -- but at a minimum i'd like to hear from the other two "summarizers" 
before proceeding that way...  Brian, Kristina, others, what say you? 

mikey


On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> 
> Again, I would rather we use my suggested text to replace all three of
> these sections - Exceptions, SRSU, and Compliance. I believe there
> several others who were in agreement that.        
> 
> 
> Tim
> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
>> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:38 pm
>> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> 
>>   Here's revised SRSU exception
>>   text that incorporates some
>>   (not all) of Eric's changes
>>   and most of Jeff N.'s wording
>>   (I tweaked it slightly by
>>   adding /SRMU and using .brand
>>   and .ngo).  I didn't receive
>>   any other changes.
>>   I've left a placeholder for
>>   other exception text (Richard
>>   - HINT!).  I've also left a
>>   placeholder for text that sets
>>   out the criticisms of SRSU.  I
>>   think it's important to
>>   include that - not only for
>>   balance, but to help those who
>>   may submit public comments.
>>   I don't know if this is DIR,
>>   but I have to offline until
>>   after 2400 GMT so am sending
>>   it along now.  (I will be back
>>   online about 90 minutes after
>>   2400 GMT if that helps.)
>>   Our document comparison
>>   software is offline so I can't
>>   generate a redline. Apologies.
>>   K

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)