RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Again, I would rather we use my suggested text to replace all three of
these sections - Exceptions, SRSU, and Compliance. I believe there
several others who were in agreement that.        


Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:38 pm
> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
>    Here's revised SRSU exception
>    text that incorporates some
>    (not all) of Eric's changes
>    and most of Jeff N.'s wording
>    (I tweaked it slightly by
>    adding /SRMU and using .brand
>    and .ngo).  I didn't receive
>    any other changes.
>    I've left a placeholder for
>    other exception text (Richard
>    - HINT!).  I've also left a
>    placeholder for text that sets
>    out the criticisms of SRSU.  I
>    think it's important to
>    include that - not only for
>    balance, but to help those who
>    may submit public comments.
>    I don't know if this is DIR,
>    but I have to offline until
>    after 2400 GMT so am sending
>    it along now.  (I will be back
>    online about 90 minutes after
>    2400 GMT if that helps.)
>    Our document comparison
>    software is offline so I can't
>    generate a redline. Apologies.
>    K