RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] direct-replacement drafts please

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My intent is to replace the three sections, Exceptions, SRU, and
Compliance, not the entire report, with my suggested text. Those
sections as currently being worked on are not the work of the WG, they
are the work of only a small subset of the WG.          

If this WG continues and wants to create a survey for public response on
various SRSU concepts, fine. But we have not discussed doing that nor do
we have the time to construct the report in such a way, even if we all
agreed, that it could be used to collect feedback on SRSU in the manner
Kristina has suggested.


Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] direct-replacement drafts please
> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:05 pm
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> hi all,
> 
> just a nudge note.  the cut-off time is approaching...  i could use a bunch 
> of "DIR-Final" email before i start my evening's work.
> 
> so far the only "DIR-Final" note i've seen is Tim's -- which, if i'm 
> understanding the thread correctly, is a proposal to reduce the whole report 
> to one page.  am i correct in my reading?  no proposals, no background, no 
> Annexes, no nothing?  or is this a proposed DIR-Final for Section 5?
> 
> i'm OK with using this for Section 5, if all three drafting-teams are OK with 
> it.  i'm also OK taking the "longer versions" of those principles out of the 
> Annexes, again if drafting-teams agree.  but i don't think it's fair to the 
> WG or the community to collapse the whole report to this single page at this 
> late date.
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)