<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] direct-replacement drafts please
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] direct-replacement drafts please
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:05:39 -0500
hi all,
just a nudge note. the cut-off time is approaching... i could use a bunch of
"DIR-Final" email before i start my evening's work.
so far the only "DIR-Final" note i've seen is Tim's -- which, if i'm
understanding the thread correctly, is a proposal to reduce the whole report to
one page. am i correct in my reading? no proposals, no background, no
Annexes, no nothing? or is this a proposed DIR-Final for Section 5?
i'm OK with using this for Section 5, if all three drafting-teams are OK with
it. i'm also OK taking the "longer versions" of those principles out of the
Annexes, again if drafting-teams agree. but i don't think it's fair to the WG
or the community to collapse the whole report to this single page at this late
date.
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|