RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

If they go in, how will it be made clear that those sections only
represent the ideas of a small subset of the WG? They did not even exist
when we did the poll! At best they are more or less minority reports.
The only general agreement that exists is for what I am proposing goes
in their place.


Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
> From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 6:56 pm
> To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> I have put some thought into it and I think it is worth including
> Kristina and Brian's summaries, even though I saw the wisdom of the 4
> points Tim eloquently stated.
> 
> -Jothan
> 
> Jothan Frakes
> +1.206-355-0230 tel
> +1.206-201-6881 fax
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > i know -- but at a minimum i'd like to hear from the other two 
> > "summarizers" before proceeding that way... Â Brian, Kristina, others, what 
> > say you?
> >
> > mikey
> >
> >
> > On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Again, I would rather we use my suggested text to replace all three of
> >> these sections - Exceptions, SRSU, and Compliance. I believe there
> >> several others who were in agreement that.
> >>
> >>
> >> Tim
> >> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> >>
> >>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
> >>> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:38 pm
> >>> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Â  Here's revised SRSU exception
> >>> Â  text that incorporates some
> >>> Â  (not all) of Eric's changes
> >>> Â  and most of Jeff N.'s wording
> >>> Â  (I tweaked it slightly by
> >>> Â  adding /SRMU and using .brand
> >>> Â  and .ngo). Â I didn't receive
> >>> Â  any other changes.
> >>> Â  I've left a placeholder for
> >>> Â  other exception text (Richard
> >>> Â  - HINT!). Â I've also left a
> >>> Â  placeholder for text that sets
> >>> Â  out the criticisms of SRSU. Â I
> >>> Â  think it's important to
> >>> Â  include that - not only for
> >>> Â  balance, but to help those who
> >>> Â  may submit public comments.
> >>> Â  I don't know if this is DIR,
> >>> Â  but I have to offline until
> >>> Â  after 2400 GMT so am sending
> >>> Â  it along now. Â (I will be back
> >>> Â  online about 90 minutes after
> >>> Â  2400 GMT if that helps.)
> >>> Â  Our document comparison
> >>> Â  software is offline so I can't
> >>> Â  generate a redline. Apologies.
> >>> Â  K
> >
> > - - - - - - - - -
> > phone   651-647-6109
> > fax             866-280-2356
> > web     http://www.haven2.com
> > handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> > etc.)
> >
> >
> >