Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

seems to me that they can get introduced as such

- use your language as the introduction

- move the more-detailed write-ups to the Annexes

- note that these are still in very early stages of discussion, represent an 
early draft from a subset of the group, and that we welcome ideas from the 
broader community

something like that work?

mikey


On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> 
> If they go in, how will it be made clear that those sections only
> represent the ideas of a small subset of the WG? They did not even exist
> when we did the poll! At best they are more or less minority reports.
> The only general agreement that exists is for what I am proposing goes
> in their place.
> 
> 
> Tim
> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
>> From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 6:56 pm
>> To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> I have put some thought into it and I think it is worth including
>> Kristina and Brian's summaries, even though I saw the wisdom of the 4
>> points Tim eloquently stated.
>> 
>> -Jothan
>> 
>> Jothan Frakes
>> +1.206-355-0230 tel
>> +1.206-201-6881 fax
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> i know -- but at a minimum i'd like to hear from the other two 
>>> "summarizers" before proceeding that way...  Brian, Kristina, others, what 
>>> say you?
>>> 
>>> mikey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Again, I would rather we use my suggested text to replace all three of
>>>> these sections - Exceptions, SRSU, and Compliance. I believe there
>>>> several others who were in agreement that.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
>>>> 
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
>>>>> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:38 pm
>>>>> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Here's revised SRSU exception
>>>>>   text that incorporates some
>>>>>   (not all) of Eric's changes
>>>>>   and most of Jeff N.'s wording
>>>>>   (I tweaked it slightly by
>>>>>   adding /SRMU and using .brand
>>>>>   and .ngo).  I didn't receive
>>>>>   any other changes.
>>>>>   I've left a placeholder for
>>>>>   other exception text (Richard
>>>>>   - HINT!).  I've also left a
>>>>>   placeholder for text that sets
>>>>>   out the criticisms of SRSU.  I
>>>>>   think it's important to
>>>>>   include that - not only for
>>>>>   balance, but to help those who
>>>>>   may submit public comments.
>>>>>   I don't know if this is DIR,
>>>>>   but I have to offline until
>>>>>   after 2400 GMT so am sending
>>>>>   it along now.  (I will be back
>>>>>   online about 90 minutes after
>>>>>   2400 GMT if that helps.)
>>>>>   Our document comparison
>>>>>   software is offline so I can't
>>>>>   generate a redline. Apologies.
>>>>>   K
>>> 
>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>> phone   651-647-6109
>>> fax             866-280-2356
>>> web     http://www.haven2.com
>>> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
>>> etc.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)