ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?

  • To: mike@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:36:02 -0700

Perfect.        


Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
> From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 7:31 pm
> To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> seems to me that they can get introduced as such
> 
> - use your language as the introduction
> 
> - move the more-detailed write-ups to the Annexes
> 
> - note that these are still in very early stages of discussion, represent an 
> early draft from a subset of the group, and that we welcome ideas from the 
> broader community
> 
> something like that work?
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> 
> > 
> > If they go in, how will it be made clear that those sections only
> > represent the ideas of a small subset of the WG? They did not even exist
> > when we did the poll! At best they are more or less minority reports.
> > The only general agreement that exists is for what I am proposing goes
> > in their place.
> > 
> > 
> > Tim
> > Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> > 
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
> >> From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 6:56 pm
> >> To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> 
> >> I have put some thought into it and I think it is worth including
> >> Kristina and Brian's summaries, even though I saw the wisdom of the 4
> >> points Tim eloquently stated.
> >> 
> >> -Jothan
> >> 
> >> Jothan Frakes
> >> +1.206-355-0230 tel
> >> +1.206-201-6881 fax
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> i know -- but at a minimum i'd like to hear from the other two 
> >>> "summarizers" before proceeding that way...  Brian, Kristina, others, 
> >>> what say you?
> >>> 
> >>> mikey
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Again, I would rather we use my suggested text to replace all three of
> >>>> these sections - Exceptions, SRSU, and Compliance. I believe there
> >>>> several others who were in agreement that.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Tim
> >>>> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> >>>> 
> >>>>> -------- Original Message --------
> >>>>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
> >>>>> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:38 pm
> >>>>> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>   Here's revised SRSU exception
> >>>>>   text that incorporates some
> >>>>>   (not all) of Eric's changes
> >>>>>   and most of Jeff N.'s wording
> >>>>>   (I tweaked it slightly by
> >>>>>   adding /SRMU and using .brand
> >>>>>   and .ngo).  I didn't receive
> >>>>>   any other changes.
> >>>>>   I've left a placeholder for
> >>>>>   other exception text (Richard
> >>>>>   - HINT!).  I've also left a
> >>>>>   placeholder for text that sets
> >>>>>   out the criticisms of SRSU.  I
> >>>>>   think it's important to
> >>>>>   include that - not only for
> >>>>>   balance, but to help those who
> >>>>>   may submit public comments.
> >>>>>   I don't know if this is DIR,
> >>>>>   but I have to offline until
> >>>>>   after 2400 GMT so am sending
> >>>>>   it along now.  (I will be back
> >>>>>   online about 90 minutes after
> >>>>>   2400 GMT if that helps.)
> >>>>>   Our document comparison
> >>>>>   software is offline so I can't
> >>>>>   generate a redline. Apologies.
> >>>>>   K
> >>> 
> >>> - - - - - - - - -
> >>> phone   651-647-6109
> >>> fax             866-280-2356
> >>> web     http://www.haven2.com
> >>> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> >>> etc.)
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy