Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

coolio.

others?  going once...  

i'm still in heavy-edit mode, but my goal is to be done in a couple hours.  so 
speak soon.  :-)

mikey


On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> 
> Perfect.        
> 
> 
> Tim
> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
>> From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 7:31 pm
>> To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> seems to me that they can get introduced as such
>> 
>> - use your language as the introduction
>> 
>> - move the more-detailed write-ups to the Annexes
>> 
>> - note that these are still in very early stages of discussion, represent an 
>> early draft from a subset of the group, and that we welcome ideas from the 
>> broader community
>> 
>> something like that work?
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> If they go in, how will it be made clear that those sections only
>>> represent the ideas of a small subset of the WG? They did not even exist
>>> when we did the poll! At best they are more or less minority reports.
>>> The only general agreement that exists is for what I am proposing goes
>>> in their place.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
>>> 
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
>>>> From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 6:56 pm
>>>> To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> 
>>>> I have put some thought into it and I think it is worth including
>>>> Kristina and Brian's summaries, even though I saw the wisdom of the 4
>>>> points Tim eloquently stated.
>>>> 
>>>> -Jothan
>>>> 
>>>> Jothan Frakes
>>>> +1.206-355-0230 tel
>>>> +1.206-201-6881 fax
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> i know -- but at a minimum i'd like to hear from the other two 
>>>>> "summarizers" before proceeding that way...  Brian, Kristina, others, 
>>>>> what say you?
>>>>> 
>>>>> mikey
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Again, I would rather we use my suggested text to replace all three of
>>>>>> these sections - Exceptions, SRSU, and Compliance. I believe there
>>>>>> several others who were in agreement that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tim
>>>>>> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>>>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] SRSU Exception Text - Revised - DIR?
>>>>>>> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 4:38 pm
>>>>>>> To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  Here's revised SRSU exception
>>>>>>>  text that incorporates some
>>>>>>>  (not all) of Eric's changes
>>>>>>>  and most of Jeff N.'s wording
>>>>>>>  (I tweaked it slightly by
>>>>>>>  adding /SRMU and using .brand
>>>>>>>  and .ngo).  I didn't receive
>>>>>>>  any other changes.
>>>>>>>  I've left a placeholder for
>>>>>>>  other exception text (Richard
>>>>>>>  - HINT!).  I've also left a
>>>>>>>  placeholder for text that sets
>>>>>>>  out the criticisms of SRSU.  I
>>>>>>>  think it's important to
>>>>>>>  include that - not only for
>>>>>>>  balance, but to help those who
>>>>>>>  may submit public comments.
>>>>>>>  I don't know if this is DIR,
>>>>>>>  but I have to offline until
>>>>>>>  after 2400 GMT so am sending
>>>>>>>  it along now.  (I will be back
>>>>>>>  online about 90 minutes after
>>>>>>>  2400 GMT if that helps.)
>>>>>>>  Our document comparison
>>>>>>>  software is offline so I can't
>>>>>>>  generate a redline. Apologies.
>>>>>>>  K
>>>>> 
>>>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>>>> phone   651-647-6109
>>>>> fax             866-280-2356
>>>>> web     http://www.haven2.com
>>>>> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
>>>>> etc.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone        651-647-6109  
>> fax                  866-280-2356  
>> web  http://www.haven2.com
>> handle       OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
>> Google, etc.)

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)