ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

FW: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll Chart

  • To: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: FW: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll Chart
  • From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:25:18 -0400

Milton's post was using old data with duplicates and the like, Jeff.  The
new numbers are correct by my read.

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:33 AM
To: Mike O'Connor
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate --
now Version 5

 

Here is what is in line 814 (Of the redline).

 


Proposal Name

In Favor

Could Live With

Opposed

No Opinion

Did not vote


JN2

12

4

20

1

26


RACK+

12

3

23

2

27


Free Trade

16

4

20

1

26


CAM3

2

12

24

2

27


IPC

1

5

29

5

27


DAGv4

0

11

27

2

27

 

I think the could live with and "Did not vote" columns are messed up.  I
cant remember the raw results, but here is what Milton posted on his blog.

 

Ranked by # supporters 
1 Free Trade 16 39%
2 JN2 12 29%
3 RACK+ 11 27%
4 CAM3 2 5%
5 DAGv4 0 0%

Ranked by acceptability
1. JN2 25 61%
2. Free Trade 20 49%
3. RACK+ 15 41%
4. CAM3 14 37%
5. DAGv4 11 29%

Ranked by strength of opposition 
1. DAGv4 27
2. CAM3 24
3. RACK+ 23
4. Free Trade 20
5. JN2 15

 

 

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 

Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

 

 

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate --
now Version 5

 

eh?  V4 and V5 poll results look the same to me.  are we looking at the same
spot?  right around line 268-273 depending on which draft?

 

note that the columns have changed from Ron's draft -- his draft followed my
convention of combining the Support and Live-With numbers in one column.
this version breaks them apart and doesn't add them together.  there was a
sub-thread about that...

 

mikey

 

 

On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

 

> Mikey,

> I know you said no content changes, but the poll results are off.....I
think columns are mixed up.....

> 

> Jeffrey J. Neuman 

> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

> 

> 

> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor

> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:10 AM

> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx

> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now
Version 5

> 

> 

> all hail Margie and Marika!

> 

> Marika updated the report and fixed a whole bunch of formatting problems
in the draft i published last night.  the latest version is Version 5, out
on the wiki at;

> 

>
https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?initial_report_snapshots

> 

> this version is strictly a formatting revision, no content changes.  but
it's the one you should use because line-numbers have changed a bit from my
draft.

> 

> thanks!

> 

> mikey

> 

> - - - - - - - - -

> phone     651-647-6109  

> fax             866-280-2356  

> web       http://www.haven2.com

> handle    OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)

> 

 

- - - - - - - - -

phone       651-647-6109  

fax         866-280-2356  

web   http://www.haven2.com

handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy