RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll Chart

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The JN2 data is NOT correct.  I cant speak for the others.  Can someone send 
the raw data.  Don't understand how JN2 supporters (and those that can live 
with it) had no duplicates, was the first in terms of overall support, and now 
goes to last.

Something is not right.

Please provide the raw data!

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:25 AM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll Chart

Milton's post was using old data with duplicates and the like, Jeff.  The new 
numbers are correct by my read.

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:33 AM
To: Mike O'Connor
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now 
Version 5


Here is what is in line 814 (Of the redline).


Proposal Name

In Favor

Could Live With

Opposed

No Opinion

Did not vote

JN2

12

4

20

1

26

RACK+

12

3

23

2

27

Free Trade

16

4

20

1

26

CAM3

2

12

24

2

27

IPC

1

5

29

5

27

DAGv4

0

11

27

2

27




I think the could live with and "Did not vote" columns are messed up.  I cant 
remember the raw results, but here is what Milton posted on his blog.


Ranked by # supporters
1 Free Trade 16 39%
2 JN2 12 29%
3 RACK+ 11 27%
4 CAM3 2 5%
5 DAGv4 0 0%
Ranked by acceptability
1. JN2 25 61%
2. Free Trade 20 49%
3. RACK+ 15 41%
4. CAM3 14 37%
5. DAGv4 11 29%
Ranked by strength of opposition
1. DAGv4 27
2. CAM3 24
3. RACK+ 23
4. Free Trade 20
5. JN2 15







Jeffrey J. Neuman

Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy





The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.







-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now 
Version 5



eh?  V4 and V5 poll results look the same to me.  are we looking at the same 
spot?  right around line 268-273 depending on which draft?



note that the columns have changed from Ron's draft -- his draft followed my 
convention of combining the Support and Live-With numbers in one column.  this 
version breaks them apart and doesn't add them together.  there was a 
sub-thread about that...



mikey





On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:



> Mikey,

> I know you said no content changes, but the poll results are off.....I think 
> columns are mixed up.....

>

> Jeffrey J. Neuman

> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

>

>

> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Mike O'Connor

> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:10 AM

> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx

> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now 
> Version 5

>

>

> all hail Margie and Marika!

>

> Marika updated the report and fixed a whole bunch of formatting problems in 
> the draft i published last night.  the latest version is Version 5, out on 
> the wiki at;

>

>     
> https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?initial_report_snapshots

>

> this version is strictly a formatting revision, no content changes.  but it's 
> the one you should use because line-numbers have changed a bit from my draft.

>

> thanks!

>

> mikey

>

> - - - - - - - - -

> phone     651-647-6109

> fax             866-280-2356

> web       http://www.haven2.com

> handle    OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> etc.)

>



- - - - - - - - -

phone       651-647-6109

fax         866-280-2356

web   http://www.haven2.com

handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
etc.)