ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order

  • To: "'Ron Andruff'" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Antony Van Couvering'" <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order
  • From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:09:54 +0200

Let's have a poll!
 
OK, OK, I admit it is a bad joke.
 
R.
 
 


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2010 21:54
To: 'Antony Van Couvering'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order



Can we split the hair any further?  In all seriousness, do you really think
that would add value.?  Please Antony, let's focus on the things that
matter.  This exercise is trying enough as it is.

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

 

 


  _____  


From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Antony Van Couvering
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:17 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order

 

Section 5, the table of support:

 

The proposal should either be ranked by level of support, or alphabetically,
or according to some other acceptable rationale...

 

Antony

 

 

 

On Jul 21, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:





Thanks Alan.  You got to it just before me. 

 

I do belive I'm a member of the WG but I'm not on the list.  While I did not
get a chance to vote in the last round, I am irrevocably for Free Trade and
would wish to always be noted as such. 

 

Thanks much.

Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================



On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


I just did a cross-check and Volker is the only one who voted and is not on
the list. However, I noted that Carlton Samuels, who did not vote, has been
a member of the WG (or at least has been on the mailing list). So that makes
the list of WG members who were eligible to vote at least 66.

Alan



At 21/07/2010 12:26 PM, Berry Cobb wrote:

I will ask when was the Volunteer list last updated?  Not to single out
anyone but for example Volker is not on this list.


Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://infinityportals.com <http://infinityportals.com/> 
866.921.8891

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:00 AM
To: Mike O'Connor; Neuman, Jeff
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate --
now Version 5
Importance: High


Still can't be right. The JN2 line totals 63 and the others all total 67.

The Volunteer list (excluding staff) on the Wiki
(https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?list_of_working_group_v
olunteers)
has 68 names, so excluding the two Board members and the two
co-chairs the totals *should* be 64.

Alan

At 21/07/2010 09:38 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>ahhh...
>
>the Did Not Vote column now reflects the *total* number of people in
>the working group.  that was another sub-thread in which it was
>pointed out that not everybody took the poll.  that previous version
>was a listing of people who took the poll, but didn't answer that question.
>
>mikey

 

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy