[gnso-vi-feb10] Table order

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Section 5, the table of support:

The proposal should either be ranked by level of support, or alphabetically, or 
according to some other acceptable rationale...

Antony



On Jul 21, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> Thanks Alan.  You got to it just before me. 
> 
> I do belive I'm a member of the WG but I'm not on the list.  While I did not 
> get a chance to vote in the last round, I am irrevocably for Free Trade and 
> would wish to always be noted as such. 
> 
> Thanks much.
> Carlton
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> I just did a cross-check and Volker is the only one who voted and is not on 
> the list. However, I noted that Carlton Samuels, who did not vote, has been a 
> member of the WG (or at least has been on the mailing list). So that makes 
> the list of WG members who were eligible to vote at least 66.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> At 21/07/2010 12:26 PM, Berry Cobb wrote:
> 
> I will ask when was the Volunteer list last updated?  Not to single out
> anyone but for example Volker is not on this list.
> 
> 
> Berry Cobb
> Infinity Portals LLC
> berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://infinityportals.com
> 866.921.8891
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: Mike O'Connor; Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate --
> now Version 5
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Still can't be right. The JN2 line totals 63 and the others all total 67.
> 
> The Volunteer list (excluding staff) on the Wiki
> (https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?list_of_working_group_v
> olunteers)
> has 68 names, so excluding the two Board members and the two
> co-chairs the totals *should* be 64.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 21/07/2010 09:38 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> >ahhh...
> >
> >the Did Not Vote column now reflects the *total* number of people in
> >the working group.  that was another sub-thread in which it was
> >pointed out that not everybody took the poll.  that previous version
> >was a listing of people who took the poll, but didn't answer that question.
> >
> >mikey
> 
>