Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now Version 5

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ahhh...

the Did Not Vote column now reflects the *total* number of people in the 
working group.  that was another sub-thread in which it was pointed out that 
not everybody took the poll.  that previous version was a listing of people who 
took the poll, but didn't answer that question.

mikey


On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Here is what is in line 814 (Of the redline).
>  
> Proposal Name
> In Favor
> Could Live With
> Opposed
> No Opinion
> Did not vote
> JN2
> 12
> 4
> 20
> 1
> 26
> RACK+
> 12
> 3
> 23
> 2
> 27
> Free Trade
> 16
> 4
> 20
> 1
> 26
> CAM3
> 2
> 12
> 24
> 2
> 27
> IPC
> 1
> 5
> 29
> 5
> 27
> DAGv4
> 0
> 11
> 27
> 2
> 27
>  
> I think the could live with and “Did not vote” columns are messed up.  I cant 
> remember the raw results, but here is what Milton posted on his blog.
>  
> Ranked by # supporters 
> 1 Free Trade 16 39%
> 2 JN2 12 29%
> 3 RACK+ 11 27%
> 4 CAM3 2 5%
> 5 DAGv4 0 0%
> 
> Ranked by acceptability
> 1. JN2 25 61%
> 2. Free Trade 20 49%
> 3. RACK+ 15 41%
> 4. CAM3 14 37%
> 5. DAGv4 11 29%
> 
> Ranked by strength of opposition 
> 1. DAGv4 27
> 2. CAM3 24
> 3. RACK+ 23
> 4. Free Trade 20
> 5. JN2 15
>  
>  
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>  
>  
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:27 AM
> To: Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now 
> Version 5
>  
> eh?  V4 and V5 poll results look the same to me.  are we looking at the same 
> spot?  right around line 268-273 depending on which draft?
>  
> note that the columns have changed from Ron's draft -- his draft followed my 
> convention of combining the Support and Live-With numbers in one column.  
> this version breaks them apart and doesn't add them together.  there was a 
> sub-thread about that...
>  
> mikey
>  
>  
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
>  
> > Mikey,
> > I know you said no content changes, but the poll results are off.....I 
> > think columns are mixed up.....
> >
> > Jeffrey J. Neuman
> > Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
> > use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> > received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> > distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
> > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
> > delete the original message.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] 
> > On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:10 AM
> > To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now 
> > Version 5
> >
> >
> > all hail Margie and Marika!
> >
> > Marika updated the report and fixed a whole bunch of formatting problems in 
> > the draft i published last night.  the latest version is Version 5, out on 
> > the wiki at;
> >
> >     
> > https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?initial_report_snapshots
> >
> > this version is strictly a formatting revision, no content changes.  but 
> > it's the one you should use because line-numbers have changed a bit from my 
> > draft.
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > mikey
> >
> > - - - - - - - - -
> > phone     651-647-6109 
> > fax             866-280-2356 
> > web       http://www.haven2.com
> > handle    OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> > etc.)
> >
>  
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone       651-647-6109 
> fax         866-280-2356 
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> etc.)
>  

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)