<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now Version 5
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now Version 5
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:32:46 -0400
Here is what is in line 814 (Of the redline).
Proposal Name
In Favor
Could Live With
Opposed
No Opinion
Did not vote
JN2
12
4
20
1
26
RACK+
12
3
23
2
27
Free Trade
16
4
20
1
26
CAM3
2
12
24
2
27
IPC
1
5
29
5
27
DAGv4
0
11
27
2
27
I think the could live with and "Did not vote" columns are messed up. I cant
remember the raw results, but here is what Milton posted on his blog.
Ranked by # supporters
1 Free Trade 16 39%
2 JN2 12 29%
3 RACK+ 11 27%
4 CAM3 2 5%
5 DAGv4 0 0%
Ranked by acceptability
1. JN2 25 61%
2. Free Trade 20 49%
3. RACK+ 15 41%
4. CAM3 14 37%
5. DAGv4 11 29%
Ranked by strength of opposition
1. DAGv4 27
2. CAM3 24
3. RACK+ 23
4. Free Trade 20
5. JN2 15
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now
Version 5
eh? V4 and V5 poll results look the same to me. are we looking at the same
spot? right around line 268-273 depending on which draft?
note that the columns have changed from Ron's draft -- his draft followed my
convention of combining the Support and Live-With numbers in one column. this
version breaks them apart and doesn't add them together. there was a
sub-thread about that...
mikey
On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> Mikey,
> I know you said no content changes, but the poll results are off.....I think
> columns are mixed up.....
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete
> the original message.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:10 AM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now
> Version 5
>
>
> all hail Margie and Marika!
>
> Marika updated the report and fixed a whole bunch of formatting problems in
> the draft i published last night. the latest version is Version 5, out on
> the wiki at;
>
>
> https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?initial_report_snapshots
>
> this version is strictly a formatting revision, no content changes. but it's
> the one you should use because line-numbers have changed a bit from my draft.
>
> thanks!
>
> mikey
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)
>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|