Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate -- now Version 5

[Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Alan.  You got to it just before me.

I do belive I'm a member of the WG but I'm not on the list.  While I did not
get a chance to vote in the last round, I am irrevocably for Free Trade and
would wish to always be noted as such.

Thanks much.
Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================


On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alan Greenberg
<alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
> I just did a cross-check and Volker is the only one who voted and is not on
> the list. However, I noted that Carlton Samuels, who did not vote, has been
> a member of the WG (or at least has been on the mailing list). So that makes
> the list of WG members who were eligible to vote at least 66.
>
> Alan
>
>
> At 21/07/2010 12:26 PM, Berry Cobb wrote:
>
>  I will ask when was the Volunteer list last updated?  Not to single out
>> anyone but for example Volker is not on this list.
>>
>>
>> Berry Cobb
>> Infinity Portals LLC
>> berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://infinityportals.com
>> 866.921.8891
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> ]
>> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:00 AM
>> To: Mike O'Connor; Neuman, Jeff
>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate --
>> now Version 5
>> Importance: High
>>
>>
>> Still can't be right. The JN2 line totals 63 and the others all total 67.
>>
>> The Volunteer list (excluding staff) on the Wiki
>> (
>> https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?list_of_working_group_v
>> olunteers)
>> has 68 names, so excluding the two Board members and the two
>> co-chairs the totals *should* be 64.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 21/07/2010 09:38 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>> >ahhh...
>> >
>> >the Did Not Vote column now reflects the *total* number of people in
>> >the working group.  that was another sub-thread in which it was
>> >pointed out that not everybody took the poll.  that previous version
>> >was a listing of people who took the poll, but didn't answer that
>> question.
>> >
>> >mikey
>>
>
>