RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

You know it was painful if writing comments on DAG4 seems fun.  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jothan Frakes
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:48 PM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: Ron Andruff; Antony Van Couvering; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order


Continuing that playful spirit, let's have a poll to see if Roberto's joke was 
funny :)

I have officially kicked the dead horse.

Jothan Frakes
+1.206-355-0230 tel
+1.206-201-6881 fax



On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Let's have a poll!
>
> OK, OK, I admit it is a bad joke.
>
> R.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2010 21:54
> To: 'Antony Van Couvering'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order
>
> Can we split the hair any further?  In all seriousness, do you really 
> think that would add value...?  Please Antony, let's focus on the things 
> that matter.  This exercise is trying enough as it is.
>
>
>
> RA
>
>
>
> Ronald N. Andruff
>
> RNA Partners, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Antony Van Couvering
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:17 PM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Table order
>
>
>
> Section 5, the table of support:
>
>
>
> The proposal should either be ranked by level of support, or 
> alphabetically, or according to some other acceptable rationale...
>
>
>
> Antony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>
> Thanks Alan.  You got to it just before me.
>
>
>
> I do belive I'm a member of the WG but I'm not on the list.  While I 
> did not get a chance to vote in the last round, I am irrevocably for 
> Free Trade and would wish to always be noted as such.
>
>
>
> Thanks much.
>
> Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround 
> =============================
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Alan Greenberg 
> <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I just did a cross-check and Volker is the only one who voted and is 
> not on the list. However, I noted that Carlton Samuels, who did not 
> vote, has been a member of the WG (or at least has been on the mailing 
> list). So that makes the list of WG members who were eligible to vote at 
> least 66.
>
> Alan
>
> At 21/07/2010 12:26 PM, Berry Cobb wrote:
>
> I will ask when was the Volunteer list last updated?  Not to single 
> out anyone but for example Volker is not on this list.
>
>
> Berry Cobb
> Infinity Portals LLC
> berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://infinityportals.com
> 866.921.8891
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:00 AM
> To: Mike O'Connor; Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] New version of the report-draft candidate 
> -- now Version 5
> Importance: High
>
>
> Still can't be right. The JN2 line totals 63 and the others all total 67.
>
> The Volunteer list (excluding staff) on the Wiki 
> (https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?list_of_working_g
> roup_v
> olunteers)
> has 68 names, so excluding the two Board members and the two co-chairs 
> the totals *should* be 64.
>
> Alan
>
> At 21/07/2010 09:38 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>>ahhh...
>>
>>the Did Not Vote column now reflects the *total* number of people in 
>>the working group.  that was another sub-thread in which it was 
>>pointed out that not everybody took the poll.  that previous version 
>>was a listing of people who took the poll, but didn't answer that question.
>>
>>mikey
>
>
>
>
>
>