Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

anybody have a problem with this?  

i'll assume this is OK unless i hear otherwise...

mikey


On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Brian Cute wrote:

> I commend the drafters (primarily RT and JN I believe) for their good attempt 
> to interpret the meaning and potential implication of DAG4.  I think it needs 
> to be made explicit that individual members of the VIWG don’t necessarily 
> adhere to this interpretation since it remains unclear what implementation of 
> DAG4 would look like if that’s what the final policy became.  Could a phrase 
> to that effect be added to the text?  “nor do all individual members of the 
> VIWG adhere to this interpretation.”

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)