RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

I think the proposal documents should identify the proponents of each.  


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
        Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:02 PM
        To: Sivasubramanian M; Mike O'Connor
        Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
        
        

        But this has been a part of the RACK proposal since the
beginning - to show the signatories, as they grew, and their diversity.
As JN2 shows that diversity within its title (Jeff and Jon), so too RACK
shows it in the signatories.

        Best,

         

        Kathy Kleiman

        Director of Policy

        .ORG The Public Interest Registry

        Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

         

        Visit us online!

        Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
<http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> 

        Find us on Facebook | dotorg
<http://www.facebook.com/pages/dotorg/203294399456?v=wall> 

        See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> 

        See our video library on YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> 

         

        CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

        Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest
Registry.  If received in error, please inform sender and then delete.

         

         

         

        From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sivasubramanian M
        Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:25 PM
        To: Mike O'Connor
        Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

         

        Mike,

         

        This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals
as featured in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of
supporters which was possibly a section that the Rack + draft included
to list co-proposers. But in the draft report, Rack + happens to be the
only proposal that shows a list of supporters. Outsiders may get the
impression (on a rapid glance) that Rack + is the 'most supported'
proposal, in the absence of a similar list of supporters in the other
proposals. So this part of the Rack + proposal may please be deleted. 

         

         

        Sivasubramanian M
        
        
        
        

        On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

        
        again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just
had an intense storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have
a road to drive on.
        
        i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to
see a way forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.
        
        looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.
Jeff, stir yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.
        
        thanks,
        
        mikey
        
        
        - - - - - - - - -
        phone   651-647-6109
        fax             866-280-2356
        web     http://www.haven2.com
        handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
Google, etc.)