RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed, JC, proponants not supporters.

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.

 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jean Christophe VIGNES
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:45 PM
To: Rosette, Kristina; Jeff Eckhaus
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items


They we all agree don't we? Proponants but not supporters.

JC


Le 22/07/10 19:31, « Rosette, Kristina » <krosette@xxxxxxx> a écrit :

>
> Agree about not listing supporters.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Eckhaus [mailto:eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:30 PM
> To: Rosette, Kristina; Jean Christophe VIGNES; Sivasubramanian M; Mike
> O'Connor
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
> There is a major difference in "key proponents" and a list of supporters.
I am
> opposed to the list of supporters but if we want to include the key
proponents
> that is another story .
> I assume IPC proposal is self-explanatory , JN2 could be listed as Jon
Nevett
> and Jeff Neuman, RACK could be Afilias/PIR , but if we decide to put down
all
> the supporters and list them than we are back to the poll situation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:25 AM
> To: Jeff Eckhaus; Jean Christophe VIGNES; Sivasubramanian M; Mike O'Connor
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
> If the key proponents of each proposal are not identified, the failure to
do
> so will be interpreted as an effort to hide the information. Even if
that's
> not the motivation (and I'm not suggesting that it is), that's how it will
be
> interpreted. We're going to have to read enough public comment as it is
> without having to wade through a bunch that seek to discredit all the work
b/c
> that information was not provided.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Jeff Eckhaus
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:19 PM
> To: Jean Christophe VIGNES; Sivasubramanian M; Mike O'Connor
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
>
> What if  I support multiple proposals? Should my name be on every proposal
I
> support? Who is responsible for adding and collecting the supporters for
each
> proposal?
>
> Maybe if we have supporters we should have opposers listed (not sure if
> opposers is a word, may need to ask Palin) .
>
> I am just pointing out how ridiculous this seems to be getting that people
> want to show their popularity and who was involved.  Is that how we want
this
> to be judged, by the people who wrote the proposals? How about we actually
let
> the proposals stand up on their own and be looked at for their merits.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Jean Christophe VIGNES
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:09 AM
> To: Sivasubramanian M; Mike O'Connor
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
>
> I fully agree. Besides the "supporters" for each proposal do appear
clearly in
> the Polls so that is at best redundant.
>
> JC
>
> Le 22/07/10 18:24, « Sivasubramanian M » <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Mike,
>
> This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals as
featured
> in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of supporters which
was
> possibly a section that the Rack + draft included to list co-proposers.
But in
> the draft report, Rack + happens to be the only proposal that shows a list
of
> supporters. Outsiders may get the impression (on a rapid glance) that Rack
+
> is the 'most supported' proposal, in the absence of a similar list of
> supporters in the other proposals. So this part of the Rack + proposal may
> please be deleted.
>
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just had an
intense
> storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have a road to drive
on.
>
> i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to see a way
> forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.
>
> looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.  Jeff, stir
> yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone   651-647-6109
> fax             866-280-2356
> web     http://www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________
> Jean-Christophe Vignes
>
> Executive Vice-President & General Counsel DCL Group 2, rue Léon Laval
> L-3372 Leudelange
>
> Tel.:  +352  20 200 123
> Mobile : +352 691 600 424
> Fax.:   +352 20 300 123
> Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> www.datacenter.eu   | www.eurodns.com   | www.voipgate.com
>
> ________________________________
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
have
> received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
> delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its
> contents to anyone.
>
> Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need
to.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may
include
> privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media,
Inc.
> Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the
> intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you
are
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this
> message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
>
>
> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may
include
> privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media,
Inc.
> Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the
> intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you
are
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this
> message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
>

______________________
Jean-Christophe Vignes

Executive Vice-President & General Counsel
DCL Group
2, rue Léon Laval
L-3372 Leudelange

Tel.:  +352  20 200 123
Mobile : +352 691 600 424
Fax.:   +352 20 300 123
Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.datacenter.eu   | www.eurodns.com   | www.voipgate.com


--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its
contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------------------