Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

the names of those who foisted CAM on the rest of you are included in a 
footnote in CAM.

i have no objection to the RACK including its list of authors/proponents.

a.

information is a good thing, the more the better people can comment


On 22 Jul 2010, at 14:45, Sivasubramanian M wrote:

> It is perfectly alright to include a list of supporters / proponents in EVERY 
> proposal, but not in one or two of several proposals.  There may not be time 
> to post lists of supporters of the remaining proposals and as Jeff Eckhaus 
> pointed out, there is also the complication of participants who support 
> multiple proposals. So the easy way out is to delete any list of supporters 
> featured in any of the proposals.
> 
> 
> Sivasubramanian M
> http://turiya.co.in
> 
> http://www.isocmadras.com
> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  Ken Stubbs wrote:
> 
> Jeff,
> Lets not try to turn this into some last minute subversive move by RACK+  to 
> include a list of supporters.
> The supporter list has been included in every RACK  proposal that was 
> submitted to this WG starting
> as far back as the middle of May.
> 
> The IPC proposal has a detailed list of 15+ participants and I have no 
> problem with that as well
> There are also references in the CAM proposal to the proposers as well.
> 
> I have no problems with including WG supporters on any of the proposals.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/22/2010 1:19 PM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
> What if  I support multiple proposals? Should my name be on every proposal I 
> support? Who is responsible for adding and collecting the supporters for each 
> proposal?
> 
> Maybe if we have supporters we should have opposers listed (not sure if 
> opposers is a word, may need to ask Palin) .
> 
> I am just pointing out how ridiculous this seems to be getting that people 
> want to show their popularity and who was involved.  Is that how we want this 
> to be judged, by the people who wrote the proposals? How about we actually 
> let the proposals stand up on their own and be looked at for their merits.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Jean Christophe VIGNES
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:09 AM
> To: Sivasubramanian M; Mike O'Connor
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
> 
> 
> I fully agree. Besides the "supporters" for each proposal do appear clearly 
> in the Polls so that is at best redundant.
> 
> JC
> 
> Le 22/07/10 18:24, « Sivasubramanian M »<isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>  a écrit :
> 
> Mike,
> 
> This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals as featured 
> in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of supporters which was 
> possibly a section that the Rack + draft included to list co-proposers. But 
> in the draft report, Rack + happens to be the only proposal that shows a list 
> of supporters. Outsiders may get the impression (on a rapid glance) that Rack 
> + is the 'most supported' proposal, in the absence of a similar list of 
> supporters in the other proposals. So this part of the Rack + proposal may 
> please be deleted.
> 
> 
> Sivasubramanian M
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> 
> again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just had an intense 
> storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have a road to drive on.
> 
> i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to see a way 
> forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.
> 
> looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.  Jeff, stir 
> yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone   651-647-6109
> fax             866-280-2356
> web     http://www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________
> Jean-Christophe Vignes
> 
> Executive Vice-President&  General Counsel DCL Group 2, rue Léon Laval
> L-3372 Leudelange
> 
> Tel.:  +352  20 200 123
> Mobile : +352 691 600 424
> Fax.:   +352 20 300 123
> Mailto: JCVignes@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> www.datacenter.eu   | www.eurodns.com   | www.voipgate.com
> 
> ________________________________
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for 
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
> received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and 
> delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its 
> contents to anyone.
> 
> Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
> privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, 
> Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the 
> intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are 
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this 
> message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
>