Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Count me in

RT


On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:

> As discussed on the call, I would like to move ahead with a group, sub-group 
> or whatever formation we decide to document and explore the “harms” that have 
> been discussed throughout the VI discussions. The harms that will come to 
> consumers has been the reason some have opposed any sort of integration, yet 
> we still do not have a definitive list of these harms and how they will 
> occur, if they are actual harms or if they have anything to do with 
> integration.  I know there have been a few links sent around and side 
> discussions, but I think that now that the Initial Report has been submitted, 
> we have time to actually work on this project and complete a formal list.
>  
> I see the discussion moving into two main areas. Harms from having 
> integration and harms from not having integration. I think that once we have 
> established each , we may be able to apply those to each proposal. Once this 
> is complete it can be included in the updated Initial Report and will most 
> likely help the Board in their decision making process since they will be 
> deciding on the positive and negative of different levels of integration.
>  
> Maybe the best way to get this moving is to start a list below and people add 
> their name.
>  
>  
>  
> Harms Team/Group
>  
> Jeffrey Eckhaus
> 
> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
> privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, 
> Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the 
> intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this 
> message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.