RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No, Jeff, I, for one, am good to have the ones who know these things
consider, study and identify them for the rest of the WG.  Once that has
been accomplished, I very much looking forward to seeing them, learning
about them and discussing them, so that we can gain a better understanding
of all of the kinds of harms that affect Internet users today - and what we
need to be watchful of tomorrow.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

 

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 3:54 PM
To: Ken Stubbs; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

 

I think the assumption should be that everyone wants to be on this.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

  _____  

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:11 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

 

Ken Stubbs wrote:

Please include me as well..

On 7/27/2010 2:58 PM, Richard Tindal wrote: 

Count me in 

 

RT

 

 

On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:

 

As discussed on the call, I would like to move ahead with a group, sub-group
or whatever formation we decide to document and explore the "harms" that
have been discussed throughout the VI discussions. The harms that will come
to consumers has been the reason some have opposed any sort of integration,
yet we still do not have a definitive list of these harms and how they will
occur, if they are actual harms or if they have anything to do with
integration.  I know there have been a few links sent around and side
discussions, but I think that now that the Initial Report has been
submitted, we have time to actually work on this project and complete a
formal list.

 

I see the discussion moving into two main areas. Harms from having
integration and harms from not having integration. I think that once we have
established each , we may be able to apply those to each proposal. Once this
is complete it can be included in the updated Initial Report and will most
likely help the Board in their decision making process since they will be
deciding on the positive and negative of different levels of integration.

 

Maybe the best way to get this moving is to start a list below and people
add their name.

 

 

 

Harms Team/Group

 

Jeffrey Eckhaus

 

  _____  

Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media,
Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this
message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.