RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- To: Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:53:50 -0400
I think the assumption should be that everyone wants to be on this.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ken Stubbs
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
Ken Stubbs wrote:
Please include me as well..
On 7/27/2010 2:58 PM, Richard Tindal wrote:
Count me in
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
As discussed on the call, I would like to move ahead with a group, sub-group or
whatever formation we decide to document and explore the "harms" that have been
discussed throughout the VI discussions. The harms that will come to consumers
has been the reason some have opposed any sort of integration, yet we still do
not have a definitive list of these harms and how they will occur, if they are
actual harms or if they have anything to do with integration. I know there
have been a few links sent around and side discussions, but I think that now
that the Initial Report has been submitted, we have time to actually work on
this project and complete a formal list.
I see the discussion moving into two main areas. Harms from having integration
and harms from not having integration. I think that once we have established
each , we may be able to apply those to each proposal. Once this is complete it
can be included in the updated Initial Report and will most likely help the
Board in their decision making process since they will be deciding on the
positive and negative of different levels of integration.
Maybe the best way to get this moving is to start a list below and people add
Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc.
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete it from your system. Thank you.