<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] Agenda for today's call
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Agenda for today's call
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:58:03 -0500
hi all,
today's call will continue the harms discussion. i'd like to pose the
following questions to stir up a lively debate
-- for which harms is vertical separation the best solution, and why? which
harms are better addressed some other way, and why?
if we have time, i'd also like to discuss where we want to take the major
contributions to date (the two harms documents from Jeff and Antony and Scott's
summary of US competition law concepts)
-- approach to completing, merging and categorizing the lists
-- approach to analyzing the lists
plus Any Other Business at the end.
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|