[gnso-vi-feb10] RE: new edit to Harms document

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kathy,

Thanks for the addition to the document and the compliance discussion. This is 
a great start to the discussion , but am unsure if this qualifies as a harm or 
harms resulting from VI or the opposite, from not having VI.
I am not arguing that the compliance issues may be more complex with VI and 
that training of employees will be needed, but are these actual harms that will 
result from VI? We can discuss on the call today, but not sure if this is the 
direction we want to be heading in this document


Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 12:25 PM
To: Mike O'Connor; vertical integration wg
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] new edit to Harms document


Hi All,
Sorry for the delay, I have added a new section on Compliance and Enforcement 
to the existing Harms document. It is drawn from the compliance and enforcement 
document the VI WG worked on together for the Initial Report. Tx to Jeff E for 
starting this document.

Best,

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:22 AM
To: vertical integration wg
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items


hi all,

this is a reminder that we tentatively set next Monday's call as the final call 
to discuss new additions to the Harms list.  so if you have harms that you'd 
like to see on the list, now is the time to submit them to the list or post 
them to the wiki.  here's a link to the "harms" wiki page;

        https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?harms

another topic for the call on Monday is to discuss our approach to analyzing 
the harms.  i pushed out a starter-list of questions that we could answer about 
each harm.  here's the list again:

-- what are examples of the harm having happened (court cases, compliance 
activity, sanctions, newspaper accounts, etc.)?

-- who was involved and how did they do it?

-- who was harmed and what was the financial and/or operational impact?

-- how long, and how often, has it happened?

-- who's proposing that it's a harm and why?

-- did this harm happen only in a vertically-integrated environment?

-- to what extent would vertical separation be an effective means to prevent 
the harm in the future?

so the agenda looks like this so far...

-- discuss the list of harms and try to close it out (not super-strict, but for 
purposes of moving on to analyzing them)

-- discuss how we want to approach analyzing the harms

-- make harm-analysis assignments

anything else for the agenda?

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109
fax             866-280-2356
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)




Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.