[gnso-vi-feb10] new edit to Harms document

["Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>]

Hi All,
Sorry for the delay, I have added a new section on Compliance and Enforcement 
to the existing Harms document. It is drawn from the compliance and enforcement 
document the VI WG worked on together for the Initial Report. Tx to Jeff E for 
starting this document.

Best,

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:22 AM
To: vertical integration wg
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items


hi all,

this is a reminder that we tentatively set next Monday's call as the final call 
to discuss new additions to the Harms list.  so if you have harms that you'd 
like to see on the list, now is the time to submit them to the list or post 
them to the wiki.  here's a link to the "harms" wiki page;

        https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?harms

another topic for the call on Monday is to discuss our approach to analyzing 
the harms.  i pushed out a starter-list of questions that we could answer about 
each harm.  here's the list again:

-- what are examples of the harm having happened (court cases, compliance 
activity, sanctions, newspaper accounts, etc.)?

-- who was involved and how did they do it?

-- who was harmed and what was the financial and/or operational impact?

-- how long, and how often, has it happened?

-- who's proposing that it's a harm and why?

-- did this harm happen only in a vertically-integrated environment? 

-- to what extent would vertical separation be an effective means to prevent 
the harm in the future? 

so the agenda looks like this so far...

-- discuss the list of harms and try to close it out (not super-strict, but for 
purposes of moving on to analyzing them)

-- discuss how we want to approach analyzing the harms

-- make harm-analysis assignments 

anything else for the agenda?

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)