<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:10:34 -0400
Hi,
I would also add that perhaps we are not all as concerned about perfecting the
list of possible harms as some of the other issues that may still be on the
plate (whatever they are). For example since at this point it was just a
laundry list of everyone's possible worry that was not being to be prioritized
or really analyzed in any way, it was not something I had a whole lot of
opinion on.
a.
On 20 Sep 2010, at 13:03, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> I'd add another bullet, which is the one that applies to me: So busy at the
> jobs that pay us that we haven't been able to be as active as we were in the
> summer.
>
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:28 PM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
>
> I am getting increasingly worried.
> The list is very quiet, while Labor Day is already behind us.
> How shall I interpret this silence?
>
> • Are we waiting for something to happen at the Board retreat?
> • Are we unclear on where to go next?
> • Are we tired after the "tour de force" of the last months?
> • Are we happy with the result so far and/or we believe that we cannot
> go any further?
> • Is there anything that people know about developments on this subject
> that I am not aware of, and that leads us to think that it is not worthed to
> go further?
> I don't want to change the plans for today's agenda, but it seems to me that
> we should dedicate a few minutes on this call to poll (in the figured sense)
> the audience on opinions on the way forward.
>
> What do people think?
> Cheers,
> Roberto
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|