ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

  • To: "mike@xxxxxxxxxx" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>, "mueller@xxxxxxx" <mueller@xxxxxxx>, Jean Christophe VIGNES <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
  • From: Jean Christophe VIGNES <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:40:23 +0200

I like it as well... I think we can also add that the so-called "default 
position" doesn't do it as is?


(Sent from my BlackBerry)
Jean-Christophe Vignes
EVP & General Counsel

DCL Group


-----Original Message-----

From: mueller@xxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:33:40 America/New_York
To: mike@xxxxxxxxxx,Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

Not bad, Mikey!
I like the first point and think it is supported by the GAC statement as well.
Could we strengthen the third point – I think SRSU had enough support from all 
sides to say something stronger than “explored further” – more like “A 
significant part of the demand for new gTLDs may come from SRSU TLDs and any 
exceptions policy should allow for them”

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:51 AM
To: vertical integration wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

just checking...

here's a starter-kit of bullet points that we might be able to put into a 
consensus statement;

-- Certain new gTLDs likely to be applied for in the first round may be 
unnecessarily impacted by restrictions on cross-ownership or control between 
registrar and registry.

-- There is need for a process that would allow applicants to request 
exceptions and have them considered on a case-by-case basis.

-- The concept of Single Registrant, Single User TLDs should be explored 

-- There will exist need for enhanced compliance efforts and the need for a 
detailed compliance plan in relation to the new gTLD program in general.

that's an ever-so-slightly edited version of the principles list...

i think there are two areas of consensus -- 1) the need for exceptions and 2) 
the importance of capable compliance.


- - - - - - - - -
phone             651-647-6109
fax                 866-280-2356
web    http://www.haven2.com
handle            OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
Google, etc.)


This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its 
contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy