Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items
- From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:19:38 -0700
To clarify, is this related to my suggestion that we'd as a group take one
area where there was the least disagreement within the VI Working Group,
regarding compliance and socialize that further?
Essentially stated (though some would certainly disagree with or seek to
further clarify) that ICANN's Compliance group will have to be vigilant and
empowered to enforce / police whatever AG Final / Board state are the
separation rules. Would discussion in and around this topic be what you
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Mikey - can you please expand on what you mean by the Compliance principle.
> I am not sure how that affects our discussions on Vertical Integration
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:40 AM
> To: vertical integration wg
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] call for agenda items
> hi all,
> having been overwhelmed with commentary on my post summarizing this week's
> call, i think we'll proceed along the lines i described in that note.
> namely, to focus on the comments that are aimed at the Principles and see
> if we can discover some new ground for the Phase I Final Report.
> so let's focus on the Compliance principle and see what we can come up with
> on the call.
> anything else?
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may
> include privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand
> Media, Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other
> than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying
> to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.