<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] .CH: Another example of Vertical Integration
- To: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] .CH: Another example of Vertical Integration
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:05:41 -0400
Volker,
... it does suggest that VI is a workable principle for community
TLDs that closely resemble ccTLDs in setup and purpose.
So here is an issue we can mull over, lack of an appropriate
application type and the lack of an appropriate contract.
When an applicant represents that the registry will "closely resemble
ccTLDs in setup and purpose", that representation could be recognized
rather than ignored by the evaluation process, and recognized rather
than ignored in the contracting process.
At that point it would be useful to consider the policy that applies
to registries and registrars.
Obviously, "closely resemble ccTLDs in setup and purpose" assumes some
definitions, and probably excludes repurposed ccTLDs, no matter how
vigorous the assertion is made that the Principle of Subsidiarity
allows ccTLD operators to ignore the responsibility and duty language
of RFC 1591.
Also obviously, a type of application that has policy consequences
applies just as well to the notions of SRSUs floating about.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|