Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Closure?

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> 
> Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> 
>>>    * There is no consensus, either on vertical integration or
>>>      vertical separation;
>> 
>> 
>> I have the impression I write in invisible ink. We have 
>> consensus that 
>> any proposal to allow the IPC alone to run SRSU is junk. We have 
>> consensus that any proposal to let some, but not all contracted 
>> parties, to run to the bank is junk. That's actually more than I ever 
>> expected, and a starting point to discover if there are 
>> conditions for 
>> which all contracted parties could pursue registry contracts.
> 
> I can guarantee that I do not write in invisible ink, so please do not
> assume I have written words that I did not. ;>)
> If we run a poll today, asking whether we agree on vertical integration or
> vertical separation, do we have a clear consensus or not?
> I believe we don't. But if somebody thinks we do, please let Mikey know, he
> will please himself in launching a poll right away... ;>)
> 
> R.

poll??  did somebody say "poll"???

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)