<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:46:11 +0200
hi,
Agree. We need to send a report to the council.
Of course, I am not sure it is really a 'final' report if we still have:
a. charter items that have not been completed
b. a request for rechartering.
It is another one of the funny misnomers we have in the GNSO system.
a.
On 26 Oct 2010, at 00:14, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> A final report is different, but that goes to Council, not the Board. The
> Council reviews and then Council sends it on to the Board. If that's what
> we're talking about, fine. But it didn't seem to me that everyone had bought
> into a final report and wrapping up the WG just yet.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|