RE: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and feasibility

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good work Avri. In my opinion the averages should work fine for
priorities; the sample is way too small for StdDev to be very valuable
but that along with the other stats are still interesting info. I don't
think that averages work for the feasibility though; it might be best to
just put whatever 2 out of 3 said, although the feasibility numbers are
probably not as critical for our current task.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:38 AM
> To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and feasibility
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The values shown in the attachment are the averages and other 
> stats based on 3 independent evaluations by the current NCA 
> members of the council (Avri, Olga and Terry).
> 
> a.
> 
>