<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and feasibility
- To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and feasibility
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:08:25 -0500
Hi,
Well I was only adding the averages to the table. The other info was
included just for completeness sake and because i was using an
adaptation of the full table.
The other stats while not necessarily statistically significant are, i
think, interesting indicators. For example they doe show how far
apart we were or weren't on some topics and show that all NCAs do not
think alike.
For the feasibility, I would prefer to just leave the averages unless
others object. My first thought, for my own evaluation, was to check
these all at 0 since i knew that i really did not know what was
scientifically feasible or not and was just educated-guessing.
Perhaps others really know what is feasible and what isn't but i
figure that at best the collective judgement will be a mixed educated-
guess. If you don't like the fractional values we can round them,
though i don't really see the need. It is interesting that so far, I
think we have the only element of perhaps thinking some of this is not
feasible.
a.
On 9 Jan 2009, at 14:19, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Good work Avri. In my opinion the averages should work fine for
priorities; the sample is way too small for StdDev to be very valuable
but that along with the other stats are still interesting info. I
don't
think that averages work for the feasibility though; it might be
best to
just put whatever 2 out of 3 said, although the feasibility numbers
are
probably not as critical for our current task.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:38 AM
To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and
feasibility
Hi,
The values shown in the attachment are the averages and other
stats based on 3 independent evaluations by the current NCA
members of the council (Avri, Olga and Terry).
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|