RE: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and feasibility

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Works for me.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:08 PM
> To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority 
> and feasibility
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Well I was only adding the averages to the table.  The other 
> info was included just for completeness sake and because i 
> was using an adaptation of the full table.
> 
> The other stats while not necessarily statistically 
> significant are, i think, interesting indicators.  For 
> example they doe show how far apart we were or weren't on 
> some topics and show that all NCAs do not think alike.
> 
> For the feasibility, I would prefer to just leave the 
> averages unless others object.  My first thought, for my own 
> evaluation, was to check these all at 0 since i knew that i 
> really did not know what was  
> scientifically feasible or not and was just educated-guessing.    
> Perhaps others really know what is feasible and what isn't 
> but i figure that at best the collective judgement will be a 
> mixed educated- guess.  If you don't like the fractional 
> values we can round them, though i don't really see the need. 
>  It is interesting that so far, I think we have the only 
> element of perhaps thinking some of this is not feasible.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On 9 Jan 2009, at 14:19, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > Good work Avri. In my opinion the averages should work fine for 
> > priorities; the sample is way too small for StdDev to be 
> very valuable 
> > but that along with the other stats are still interesting info. I 
> > don't think that averages work for the feasibility though; 
> it might be 
> > best to just put whatever 2 out of 3 said, although the feasibility 
> > numbers are probably not as critical for our current task.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 11:38 AM
> >> To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] NCA values for study priority and 
> >> feasibility
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The values shown in the attachment are the averages and 
> other stats 
> >> based on 3 independent evaluations by the current NCA 
> members of the 
> >> council (Avri, Olga and Terry).
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>