[gnso-whois-dt] FW: IPC Docs -- input on WHOIS studies and working definitions
All, Here are the WHOIS study priority ratings, and input on "working definitions" provided by the IPC. I am in the process of getting this information uploaded to the WHOIS wiki workspace. Thanks, Liz From: Eulgen, Lee J. [mailto:LEulgen@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:23 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Liz Gasster Cc: Metalitz, Steven Subject: IPC Docs Importance: High Chuck and Liz -- Happy MLK Day to you both. As promised, attached are three documents: (1) the IPC's numeric values concerning the feasibility and priority of each submitted study; (2) a revised version of the Whois-related definitions reflecting the IPC's suggested edits; and (3) a redline specifically identifying the IPC's suggested edits to the definitions. As always, should either of you have questions do not hesitate to let me or Steve know. Lee Lee J. Eulgen Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 2 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2300 Chicago, Illinois 60602-3801 312.269.8465 312.578.2807 (facsimile) leulgen@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:leulgen@xxxxxxxxxx> AIM: LeeEulgen CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any attachments without copying or further transmitting the same. Attachment:
NGEDOCS-#1595730-v2-Whois_Definitions.DOC Attachment:
NGEDOCS-#1595731-v1-Studies_Values.DOC Attachment:
ICANN Redline.rtf
|