<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-whois-study] Documents for tomorrow's call
- To: Patrick Jones <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-whois-study] Documents for tomorrow's call
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 22:49:04 -0700
Patrick,
First, there is nothing in sac027 that relates to IDNs. Second, I've
been trying to fix-or-kill whois since ... IETF-49 and IETF-51, so
"earlier" is the correct answer. Third, the intersection between Steve
and Dave's memo and ASCII strings that begin in "xn--" is ... zero.
Turning to CRISP and ISIS, there's the ICANN announcement of September
18th, 2003 on the subject, so even if it were an "advance" (and we don't
call each other's protocols "advanced" or "retarded" in the IETF,
although "brain dead" is used with some relish), its been around long
enough to have been discussed at least once previously. Mercifully, at
some Verisign product event and not this study group.
Cheers,
Eric
Patrick Jones wrote:
In reviewing the WHOIS Study priority tally, there is an area that
this group is overlooking: IDN implications of the current WHOIS. This
is not a new issue. Recently, SSAC called attention to this in SSAC 27
(http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac027.pdf),
<http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac027.pdf%29,> but IETF and
others have been working on it going back to at least 2004, if not
earlier. This group might want to discuss protocol advances such as
CRISP and IRIS and how these advances provide a way for
internationalization of registration data.
Category #7 (WHOIS Accuracy) in its current form does not capture the
issue. Internationalization of registration data might be its own
study category.
Patrick
--
Patrick L. Jones
Registry Liaison Manager &
Coordinator, ICANN Nominating Committee
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: +1 310 301 3861
Fax: +1 310 823 8649
patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|