ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-whois-study]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-whois-study] documents for tomorrow's call

  • To: "Liz Gasster" <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-whois-study] documents for tomorrow's call
  • From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:25:10 -0300

Liz,

The ISPCP has agreed upon the following study priorities:

Misuse  DPA  Availability  Demand  Impact   Proxy  Accuracy

   7         5          4              3          2          6           1

Thanks

Tony Harris

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Liz Gasster 
  To: gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 10:06 PM
  Subject: [gnso-whois-study] documents for tomorrow's call


  All,

   

  Attached please find three draft documents for your review, as follows:

   

  1.       Updated tally sheet of participant/constituency views

  2.       Draft updated list of study submissions that includes the GAC 
proposals under the designated category.  Please consider also a new "category 
8" which includes several GAC recommendations that do not map to any study 
previously recommended.  

  3.       DRAFT placeholder "report" to the GNSO Council with gaps where group 
viewpoints can be inserted.  Feel free to suggest edits to the background text 
I've drafted. 

   

  To-date I have not seen any draft language for the 2 viewpoints shared on the 
full list.  Note that on our last call we agreed that representatives of the 
(2) differing viewpoints would draft initial language setting forth the two 
points of view and supporting rationale.  The group that is supporting further 
studies would also try to develop a proposal for certain studies, and 
supporting rationale, that all study proponents might endorse.  This would form 
the basis for text in the attached report, sections 2 and 3.  

   

  Let's discuss all on tomorrow's call, including how we can expedite 
completion by 22 May.  BTW I'm still pursuing follow-up on the request about 
IRIS and CRISP.  I hope to have some feedback ASAP.  

   

  Thanks, Liz


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy