RE: [gnso-whois-study] list of studies with original hypotheses attached

[Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have emails for many but not all of the submitters.  Glen and I can check on 
whether the others can be obtained (I do not have email addresses for study #s 
5, 8, 12, 21-23).  Assuming so, we could solicit their input directly, and I 
can coordinate once we have developed draft hypotheses.  We should consider 
whether to try this with the GAC too?  It may be difficult for the GAC to 
respond quickly as a group but at least GAC representatives would be given the 
opportunity to review what we've done.  Thoughts on this are appreciated as 
well.

Liz

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:50 PM
To: Liz Gasster; gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-study] list of studies with original hypotheses 
attached

Very nicely and quickly done Liz. Thanks.

Glen - would you please post this on the wiki; I'm sure I don't even have to 
ask.

Liz - are the email addresses for the submitters of the studies readily 
available?  I am wondering whether the following would be a good idea: in cases 
where we modified the hypotheses from what were specificallly stated by the 
proposer (or not stated by the proposer) and where the proposer is not in our 
group, send our drafted hypothesis to the proposer for comment within 5-7 days? 
 My fear is that this will complicate the process and I do not want to do that; 
at the same time, it probably would be a useful action to take.  Thoughts from 
anyone on the list are welcome regarding whether we should do this.

Chuck


________________________________
From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 3:32 PM
To: gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-study] list of studies with original hypotheses attached
All, attached is a list of proposed studies that includes the original 
hypotheses offered by each submitter.  Steve Metalitz - please look at yours 
and edit as you like. Note again that the study recommendations offered by the 
GAC did not include hypotheses, these are left blank in the attached listing.

Please let me know if you have any corrections.  Thanks, Liz