[gnso-whois-study] updated matrix based on input from original study submitters
All, Attached is our updated Whois hypotheses matrix (in Word), annotated with feedback from the original submitters of various studies. In all I sent out 7 queries regarding 15 study suggestions. I heard back from 5 people regarding 11 suggestions. 8 of the 11 reformulated hypotheses were confirmed as acceptable by the original submitters. In 3 cases, the original submitters offered alternative wording, highlighted in the attached document. These are study suggestion numbers 8, 13 and 16. We should plan to discuss these on Tuesday's call. Note that for now I have NOT updated the wiki to reflect these suggestions and would prefer not to do so unless the group would find that particularly useful, in which case I am happy to update. Separately, I reviewed all of the study suggestions to determine whether additions should be made to add "pearls of wisdom" to certain hypotheses. Upon review, while I note that there is useful detail regarding methodology, nothing rises to the level relevant for the Council report, though clearly various notes may be useful at a later stage. Thanks for indulging me the chance to make sure. Best, Liz Attachment:
WHOIS study hypotheses noted with comments from orig submitters 21 Aug 2008.doc
|