ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-whoissurvey-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Revised charter for your review (please disregard last version)

  • To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Revised charter for your review (please disregard last version)
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:11:22 -0400

Hi,

1st: I apologize for not making any of the meeting, but non of them where 
scheduled at a time when I could make it.
2nd: i apologize for having opinions even though i was never  able to make it 
to any meetings.

My primary concern with the plan is that the write up for task a and the 
schedule seem to preclude any sense of scientific validty for the study.  I 
know that you used Chuck's plan for the process, but if you recall, my main 
disagreement with Chuck;s proposal had to do with the need for rigor in the 
study.  I am fully convinced that any study done without proper scientific 
methodology is essentially worthless and become yet another bit of creative 
ambiguity that can be used by all sides to buttress their arguments.

I also see no mention of coordination with the work being done by the GNSO/SSAC 
IRDWG.

I have added some comments to Don's edited version.

a.

Attachment: WSDT Charter draft 11 Aug 2011 - blumenthal+ad.doc
Description: MS-Word document


On 21 Aug 2011, at 19:29, Don Blumenthal wrote:

> Some thoughts just under the wire. Apologies in advance if my professor side 
> is in overdrive in some of the suggestions. I have to warm up for the start 
> of the semester.
> 
> Don
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster 
> [liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:09 PM
> To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Revised charter for your review (please 
> disregard last version)
> 
> All,
> 
> I erroneously updated the wrong version of the charter – here is the correct 
> one for your review (my apologies!).
> 
> The milestone dates have been adjusted, redlined as you’ll see.  Please 
> provide any suggested edits by 22 August.  A final version will be submitted 
> to the GNSO Council by the 31st to meet the deadline for Council review at 
> its upcoming meeting on 8 September.
> 
> Best regards, Liz
> <WSDT Charter draft 11 Aug 2011 - blumenthal.doc>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy