Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Work Suspension Question

[MICHAEL YOUNG <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the feedback Susan,

I'm afraid we would need to see some output from everyone to warrant the next 
meeting. I can't justify scheduling another meeting until we have something to 
review.

Berry could you please remind everyone about what's outstanding in the action 
items?

Everyone, if you could respond to Berry with firm delivery dates for your 
commitments we can plan on another meeting based on when we can have some work 
to go over. 

Susan if we can get output, I'm happy to keep on with the schedule - let's see 
what the group is able to offer for hard deliverables.

-Michael


On 2012-03-04, at 10:59 PM, Prosser, Susan wrote:

> I can understand the reason behind your suggestion, Michael. We need active 
> involvement from all members.  
> 
> But, I agree with others comments. April 12 will not change my workload.  I 
> would prefer we stay with current schedule. 
> -Susan
> 
> 
> On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Brigner, Paul <Paul_Brigner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I am sorry for jumping in and out so quickly, but I will be moving to 
> > another organization in a couple of weeks and I do not expect I will be 
> > able to participate as I make the transition.  I wish you all the best as 
> > you continue to work on this project.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Paul Brigner
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 8:42 PM, "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> My distractions haven't been from the new gTLD process and are easing up 
> >> (I hope). I appreciate the idea behind holding the process until April but 
> >> I'm not sure that it will make a difference for those who are involved in 
> >> the new domain process.
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Michael Young 
> >> <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:53:32 -0500
> >> To: Whois Survey WG 
> >> <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Work Suspension Question
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> As you may have noticed from lack of traffic on our mailing list, we are 
> >> struggling with getting our volunteer’s time and attention these days.  I 
> >> am quite proud we made as much forward progress as we did in January and 
> >> early February but we seem to be in ever-increasing conflict with the many 
> >> effects of the new TLD application period.  As you know I’ve talked with a 
> >> number of you and we’ve collectively talked on the call about the immense 
> >> work load many are under at the moment. We lost one of our co-chairs to 
> >> this issue directly.
> >>
> >> This is an exceptional time in our industry but I believe that once the 
> >> applications are in there will be a period where people are more available 
> >> again.  The approval and processing period of the applications provides us 
> >> with some respite – although we will all have our regular “day” jobs 
> >> still.   As I result I suggest we suspend our efforts until April 16th 
> >> when we would reinitiate our meetings.  At this point I think we can 
> >> accelerate again and make up for the lost time. Our recent new approach is 
> >> more efficient and will just a little time from our volunteers, I believe 
> >> we can catch up to our original intended schedule (in terms of results).
> >>
> >> My question to the group is, do you agree this is a practical suggestion 
> >> or do you wish to suggest another alternative?
> >>
> >> Wendy, if the group agrees, we would ask you to communicate this schedule 
> >> adjustment to the council on our behalf.
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Michael Young
> >> Chief Technology Officer
> >> Architelos
> >> M:+1-647-289-1220
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> MICHAEL YOUNG
> >> myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >




MICHAEL YOUNG
myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx