Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Work Suspension Question

[Wilson Abigaba <abigabaw@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Team Members,

I agree with Susan that my workload won't change after the application
period but the good thing is we'll all be to continue . I think it would be
best to get confirmation from the team members that April is the best time
to restart and commit to sticking to the timelines thereafter. A doodle
poll for this, perhaps?

Regarding my action items, I was supposed to review survey code capability
to enable user return to survey for completion at later time and also draft
the survey after the team have given me their edited questions (that comply
to the question types we agreed on).

I didn't not receive any feedback regarding the edited questions, so I just
decided to start on the draft survey using the questions we already had. I
also confirm that its possible to continue an unfinished survey (as you
will see below) but I must stress (again) that I feel the questions we have
are way too many. The link to the draft survey (only the first few
questions) is here:

http://isoc.ug/icann/whoissurvey/index.php?sid=36492&newtest=Y&lang=en

Please review, and if you have spare time, please give feedback.

By the way, I will be in San Jose this weekend for the meeting. If any if
you are planning to be there, it would be interesting to meet with you
during the course of the week.

Thanks!

Kind Regards,
Wilson


On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 07:13, MICHAEL YOUNG <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback Susan,
>
> I'm afraid we would need to see some output from everyone to warrant the
> next meeting. I can't justify scheduling another meeting until we have
> something to review.
>
> Berry could you please remind everyone about what's outstanding in the
> action items?
>
> Everyone, if you could respond to Berry with firm delivery dates for your
> commitments we can plan on another meeting based on when we can have some
> work to go over.
>
> Susan if we can get output, I'm happy to keep on with the schedule - let's
> see what the group is able to offer for hard deliverables.
>
> -Michael
>
>
> On 2012-03-04, at 10:59 PM, Prosser, Susan wrote:
>
> I can understand the reason behind your suggestion, Michael. We need
> active involvement from all members.
>
> But, I agree with others comments. April 12 will not change my workload.
>  I would prefer we stay with current schedule.
> -Susan
>
>
> On Saturday, March 3, 2012, Brigner, Paul <Paul_Brigner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I am sorry for jumping in and out so quickly, but I will be moving to
> another organization in a couple of weeks and I do not expect I will be
> able to participate as I make the transition.  I wish you all the best as
> you continue to work on this project.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Paul Brigner
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 8:42 PM, "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> My distractions haven't been from the new gTLD process and are easing
> up (I hope). I appreciate the idea behind holding the process until April
> but I'm not sure that it will make a difference for those who are involved
> in the new domain process.
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Michael Young <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:53:32 -0500
> >> To: Whois Survey WG <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Work Suspension Question
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> As you may have noticed from lack of traffic on our mailing list, we
> are struggling with getting our volunteer’s time and attention these days.
>  I am quite proud we made as much forward progress as we did in January and
> early February but we seem to be in ever-increasing conflict with the many
> effects of the new TLD application period.  As you know I’ve talked with a
> number of you and we’ve collectively talked on the call about the immense
> work load many are under at the moment. We lost one of our co-chairs to
> this issue directly.
> >>
> >> This is an exceptional time in our industry but I believe that once the
> applications are in there will be a period where people are more available
> again.  The approval and processing period of the applications provides us
> with some respite – although we will all have our regular “day” jobs still.
>   As I result I suggest we suspend our efforts until April 16th when we
> would reinitiate our meetings.  At this point I think we can accelerate
> again and make up for the lost time. Our recent new approach is more
> efficient and will just a little time from our volunteers, I believe we can
> catch up to our original intended schedule (in terms of results).
> >>
> >> My question to the group is, do you agree this is a practical
> suggestion or do you wish to suggest another alternative?
> >>
> >> Wendy, if the group agrees, we would ask you to communicate this
> schedule adjustment to the council on our behalf.
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Michael Young
> >> Chief Technology Officer
> >> Architelos
> >> M:+1-647-289-1220
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> MICHAEL YOUNG
> >> myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> MICHAEL YOUNG
> myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>