<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] R9 Assistance Please
- To: "'Berry Cobb'" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] R9 Assistance Please
- From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:04:44 +0000
I believe migration is the main relevant topic from those listed below.
I volunteered on the last call to identify some additional terms that could
benefit from "hover" definitions. These include:
R-2: RDDS
R-3: Standard, formal, extensible
Data Structure and schema
R-8: elevated access rights
Steve Metalitz
From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:03 PM
To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] R9 Assistance Please
WSWG,
Per our last session on 16 April, the WG discussed whether the inclusion of R9
- Thick WHOIS survey questions should be included or not given the requirement
of Thick WHOIS for the new gTLDs. In general, there was agreement that value
exists for including Thick WHOIS questions. This is the last R section to be
completed.
We need assistance from the WG on questions that may be most relevant to the R9
topic. Given the current size of the survey, no more than four or five
questions need to be developed. Please respond back to the list with ideas you
may have that are most relevant to our technical survey.
A few technical topics may include:
* Migration from thin to thick WHOIS
* Access levels of a thick WHOIS model
* Architecture
* Prioritization
* Others?
If you have suggestions, please try to frame the questions and choice options
similar to the format we have loaded in the draft survey today.
Thank you for your help. B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|