<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats
- To: "gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>, "mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats
- From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:25:08 -0400
I'm disappointed also given the early apparent interest. Either meeting day
works now but the schedules for both are fluid now pending possible travel.
Don
Sent from my PDA phone
-----Original Message-----
From: Berry Cobb [mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Received: Monday, 22 Oct 2012, 12:33pm
To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx [gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Survey Stats
Team,
Here are the participant stats as of today:
35 Full Responses
131 Incomplete Responses (19 Saved)
166 Total
At this point, I guess I was expecting twice this amount. There are 10 days
remaining before the survey closes. Toward the end of the week, I will push
out fresh announcements about the survey close on icann.org, twitter, etc.
Does the team have any other ideas to spread the word for increasing
participation?
I’ve attached the latest PDF showing the results. I recommend that the team
start taking a close look as this will be the basis for which the team will
determine how best to analyze the results and formulate recommendations.
Lastly, when will the team like to reconvene? 5 November 2012 is what I had
tentatively planned. Will it be beneficial to meet on the 29 October?
Thank you. B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|