Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

[Michael Young <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Berry

Thanks again for all the hard work, and thanks for everyone who participated. 
However, I have to ask, given the recent report by the Whois expert working 
group, which recommends a singular monolithic Whois, is this data still useful? 
What do others think?

Best Regards,

Michael Young

M:647-289-1220

On 2013-06-27, at 16:26, "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Steven,
>  
> You beat me to the punch sending an email to the list.  I’m having a few 
> ICANN Staff review the draft report for feedback and I expect to get it 
> tomorrow.  After making changes, I will send it out to the WSWG no later than 
> next Monday for the WG to review it and begin solicitation for feedback.
>  
> Based on comments or suggested changes supplied to the mail list, we can then 
> make a determination if we need to reconvene the WG, post the report for 
> public comment, or submit the final report directly to the GNSO Council.
>  
> In short, there seems to be general support for most of the technical 
> requirements supplied in the Inventory of WHOIS Service Requirements final 
> report.  However, the initial draft recommendations in our Final Report are 
> few:
> 1.       Final determination on whether ICANN should create a machine 
> parsable list of WHOIS services (port 43, web)
> 2.       Deliver report to EWG for their consideration
> 3.       Deliver report to IETF WEIRDS for their consideration
>  
> I will send it out shortly.  Thank you everyone for your patience. 
>  
> B
>  
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:42
> To: 'Berry Cobb'; gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps
>  
> Hi Berry,
>  
> I note you addressed the drafting of this report on the pre-Durban policy 
> webinar today.  Please let us know when you expect this draft report to be 
> available for review.  And thanks for your ongoing work to move this forward.
>  
> Steve Metalitz    
>  
> From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:45 PM
> To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps
>  
> Team,
>  
> Based on limited participation, we will be suspending the WSWG calls.  In the 
> meantime, ICANN Staff will complete the analysis and report.  Thank you again 
> to those who have contributed, it will be helpful in getting all sections 
> completed.
>  
> Once the draft report is complete, I will send it out to the WG mailing list 
> for feedback from the team.  After any changes, we can decide then if it is 
> worth opening a public comment forum or not prior to delivery to the GNSO 
> Council.
>  
> My apologies for the late cancellation for today’s session!
>  
> Take care, B
>  
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
>  
>