Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

[Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the comment, Michele. I was going to suggest that but it clearly 
means more coming from an EWG member.

And even if a monolithic public lookup system is the final decision, what 
people will want from it still needs to be discussed.

Don

From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" 
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:07 PM
To: Michael Young 
<myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Berry Cobb 
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Whois Survey WG 
<gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

Michael

I'm on the EWG, so I'll speak to that .. (though I can't speak for the EWG as a 
whole)

The EWG's report is not "final" or "done".

We have been and continue to examine any and all relevant data, so I'd view 
this data as being very useful.

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>]
 on behalf of Michael Young 
[myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: 27 June 2013 22:02
To: Berry Cobb
Cc: <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

Hi Berry

Thanks again for all the hard work, and thanks for everyone who participated. 
However, I have to ask, given the recent report by the Whois expert working 
group, which recommends a singular monolithic Whois, is this data still useful? 
What do others think?

Best Regards,

Michael Young

M:647-289-1220

On 2013-06-27, at 16:26, "Berry Cobb" 
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Hi Steven,

You beat me to the punch sending an email to the list.  I’m having a few ICANN 
Staff review the draft report for feedback and I expect to get it tomorrow.  
After making changes, I will send it out to the WSWG no later than next Monday 
for the WG to review it and begin solicitation for feedback.

Based on comments or suggested changes supplied to the mail list, we can then 
make a determination if we need to reconvene the WG, post the report for public 
comment, or submit the final report directly to the GNSO Council.

In short, there seems to be general support for most of the technical 
requirements supplied in the Inventory of WHOIS Service Requirements final 
report.  However, the initial draft recommendations in our Final Report are few:

1.       Final determination on whether ICANN should create a machine parsable 
list of WHOIS services (port 43, web)

2.       Deliver report to EWG for their consideration

3.       Deliver report to IETF WEIRDS for their consideration

I will send it out shortly.  Thank you everyone for your patience.

B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb


From:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:42
To: 'Berry Cobb'; 
gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

Hi Berry,

I note you addressed the drafting of this report on the pre-Durban policy 
webinar today.  Please let us know when you expect this draft report to be 
available for review.  And thanks for your ongoing work to move this forward.

Steve Metalitz

From:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:45 PM
To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

Team,

Based on limited participation, we will be suspending the WSWG calls.  In the 
meantime, ICANN Staff will complete the analysis and report.  Thank you again 
to those who have contributed, it will be helpful in getting all sections 
completed.

Once the draft report is complete, I will send it out to the WG mailing list 
for feedback from the team.  After any changes, we can decide then if it is 
worth opening a public comment forum or not prior to delivery to the GNSO 
Council.

My apologies for the late cancellation for today’s session!

Take care, B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb