Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps

[MICHAEL YOUNG <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks very Michele,

-M


On 2013-06-27, at 5:07 PM, "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" 
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Michael
> 
> I'm on the EWG, so I'll speak to that .. (though I can't speak for the EWG as 
> a whole)
> 
> The EWG's report is not "final" or "done".
> 
> We have been and continue to examine any and all relevant data, so I'd view 
> this data as being very useful.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Michele
> 
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://mneylon.tel/
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Michael Young 
> [myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 June 2013 22:02
> To: Berry Cobb
> Cc: <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps
> 
> Hi Berry
> 
> Thanks again for all the hard work, and thanks for everyone who participated. 
> However, I have to ask, given the recent report by the Whois expert working 
> group, which recommends a singular monolithic Whois, is this data still 
> useful? What do others think?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Michael Young
> 
> M:647-289-1220
> 
> On 2013-06-27, at 16:26, "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steven,
>>  
>> You beat me to the punch sending an email to the list.  I’m having a few 
>> ICANN Staff review the draft report for feedback and I expect to get it 
>> tomorrow.  After making changes, I will send it out to the WSWG no later 
>> than next Monday for the WG to review it and begin solicitation for feedback.
>>  
>> Based on comments or suggested changes supplied to the mail list, we can 
>> then make a determination if we need to reconvene the WG, post the report 
>> for public comment, or submit the final report directly to the GNSO Council.
>>  
>> In short, there seems to be general support for most of the technical 
>> requirements supplied in the Inventory of WHOIS Service Requirements final 
>> report.  However, the initial draft recommendations in our Final Report are 
>> few:
>> 1.       Final determination on whether ICANN should create a machine 
>> parsable list of WHOIS services (port 43, web)
>> 2.       Deliver report to EWG for their consideration
>> 3.       Deliver report to IETF WEIRDS for their consideration
>>  
>> I will send it out shortly.  Thank you everyone for your patience. 
>>  
>> B
>>  
>> Berry Cobb
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> 720.839.5735
>> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> @berrycobb
>>  
>>  
>> From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
>> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:42
>> To: 'Berry Cobb'; gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps
>>  
>> Hi Berry,
>>  
>> I note you addressed the drafting of this report on the pre-Durban policy 
>> webinar today.  Please let us know when you expect this draft report to be 
>> available for review.  And thanks for your ongoing work to move this forward.
>>  
>> Steve Metalitz    
>>  
>> From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
>> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 3:45 PM
>> To: gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] WSWG Next Steps
>>  
>> Team,
>>  
>> Based on limited participation, we will be suspending the WSWG calls.  In 
>> the meantime, ICANN Staff will complete the analysis and report.  Thank you 
>> again to those who have contributed, it will be helpful in getting all 
>> sections completed.
>>  
>> Once the draft report is complete, I will send it out to the WG mailing list 
>> for feedback from the team.  After any changes, we can decide then if it is 
>> worth opening a public comment forum or not prior to delivery to the GNSO 
>> Council.
>>  
>> My apologies for the late cancellation for today’s session!
>>  
>> Take care, B
>>  
>> Berry Cobb
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> 720.839.5735
>> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> @berrycobb
>>  
>>  




MICHAEL YOUNG
myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx