Re: [gnso-workplan-subteam-policyimpl] Notes from our meeting yesterday + doodle poll

[Olivier Kouami <olivierkouami@xxxxxxxxx>]

THANK YOU SO MUCH DEAR MARIKA FOR THESE NOTES,
VERY CLEAR;
-Olevie-



2013/9/25 Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>

> Dear All,
>
> Following our call yesterday, please find attached the mind map that aims
> to capture some of our notes / discussions (in pdf and mmap version). To
> review examples of work plans developed by other recent WGs please see:
>
>    - IGO-INGO PDP -
>    https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/Work+Plan+Drafts
>    - Thick Whois PDP WG - https://community.icann.org/x/5ZhwAg (for mind
>    maps see https://community.icann.org/x/AoBQAg)
>    - UDRP Domain Name Lock PDP WG - https://community.icann.org/x/LYgoAg (FYI,
>    you'll find attached the mind map that formed the basis for this work plan)
>
> As you'll note, most of these work plans are developed based on an initial
> outline of the approach developed via mind maps and/or WG discussions. Once
> some of the basic questions are answered (e.g. what needs to be done to
> answer the charter questions and how is the WG going to develop these
> answers), it is relatively straightforward to translate this into a
> proposed work plan, including expected timing and milestones. For our
> effort, based on our conversation yesterday, some of the main questions
> that need to be answered first in order to be able to develop the work plan
> appear to be:
>
>    - What needs to be done / understood before the WG can start tackling
>    these charter questions? (e.g. What basic materials need to be read, should
>    external material / experts be explored involved, do we need to create
>    working definitions for some of the concepts we are dealing with? - note,
>    some of this work is already in progress with the presentation later today)
>    - Is there linkage between charter questions i.e. do certain / all
>    questions need to be considered jointly, or can they be split up and worked
>    on separately? If work can be carried out independently, should this be
>    done in parallel or sequently?
>    - Is there one/more charter question(s) that would need to be
>    addressed first before the other charter questions can be answered?
>    - Would it be desirable to create sub-teams to carry out some of the
>    tasks identified and/or tackle charter questions? If yes, what process
>    should be in place for managing such sub-teams and ensure co-ordination
>    with the broader WG? Would it be desirable / feasible to have more than one
>    sub-team run at the same time?
>    - For each charter question – what information needs to be reviewed /
>    gathered in order to be able to develop recommendations that are fact /
>    experienced based? How can such information be gathered?
>    - What would be an ambitious but realistic deadline for delivering and
>    completing this work?
>    - At what points in the process should community consultation be
>    foreseen and how can this be done most effectively?
>
> In order to schedule our next meeting, please complete the following
> doodle poll: http://www.doodle.com/puzrs3bgdt372x8c (as noted, policy
> staff has some limitations next week due to our meetings in LA for which
> our apologies).
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika
>



-- 
Olévié (Olivier) A. A. KOUAMI
Membre de ISoc (www.isog.org) & du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net)
DG Ets GIDA-OKTETS & CEO de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org)
PC Vice Chair for Francophone Africa ICANN-NCSG/NPOC (http://www.npoc.org/)
SG de ESTETIC  (http://www.estetic.tg)
Po Box : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 928 512 41 / (228) 224 999 25
Skype : olevie1 Facebook : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo