Re: [gnso-workplan-subteam-policyimpl] Attendance and Recording Policy and Implementation Sub-Team -- Wg Sub Team Descriptions. m

[Gnosis IP Law <gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx>]

I asked me bers of the Work Plan sub team to prepare more detailed descriptions 
of the tasks and deliverables of the various proposed sub teams.  Please send 
these to the group so we can review them and incorporate into the draft work 
plan.  Check wiki if you forgot your assignment.

Thanks!

Michael R. Graham
Gnosis IP Law & Consulting
Mgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(847) 997-4223


> On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Nathalie Peregrine 
> <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> Please find the MP3 recording for the Policy and Implementation Sub-Team call 
> held on Monday 14th October 2013 at 12:00 UTC at:
>  
> https://icann.box.com/shared/static/s0ns778bmdl89yas7e6p.mp3
>  
> Attendees:
> Michael Graham – IPC
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr – ALAC
> Amr Elsadr - NCUC
>  
> Apology:
> Holly Raiche – ALAC
>  
>  
> ICANN staff:
> Marika Konings 
> Mary Wong
> Nathalie Peregrine
>  
> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
>  
>  
>  Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/y1V-Ag
>  
> Thank you.
> Kind regards,
> Nathalie Peregrine
> For GNSO Secretariat
>  
> Adobe Chat Transcript for Monday 14 October 2013:
>  
>    Nathalie  Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the Policy and Implementation 
> Work Plan Sub-Team Meeting on Monday 14 October 2013 at 1200 UTC
>   Nathalie  Peregrine:Please bear in mind that there is NO audio enabled in 
> the AC room for today's call so please all dial into the audio bridge, 
> password PI, US Toll free: 866-692-5726
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Understood  Michael  and are we also not going to 
> produce a 'matching to MindMap' grid form (spreadsheet) doc listoing columsa 
> of Date, Activity, Responsability  etc..,  as well for 22/23 Oct?
>   Marika Konings:The sub-teams could consider running during alternate weeks, 
> should the WG decide that it would be helpful to have parallel sub-teams
>   Marika Konings:Also, presumably Deliverable 0 and V would be done by the 
> whole WG, while Deliverables I and II-IV may be done by two sub-teams?
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:indeed Marika
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:You and me both Micheal  I hae a starter doc as well ;-)
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:sorry name typo
>   Michael R. Graham:Just lost my phone connect -- will redial.
>   Amr Elsadr:Sorry I'm late. This meeting conflicted with my son's dentist 
> appoitment.
>   Amr Elsadr:dialling in now.
>   Nathalie  Peregrine:he's on
>   Amr Elsadr:Just joined the call. Sorry again about the delay.
>   Amr Elsadr:Hi Marika.
>   Nathalie  Peregrine:Amr, there is no audio in the AC room, if you need a 
> dial out please let me know
>   Mary Wong:Welcome, Amr.
>   Amr Elsadr:I got disconnected, but dialled back in. I'm on the call.
>   Amr Elsadr:Hi Mary.
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:indeed is this a leass than 1 year  June 14. vs  1,2 or 
> 3 year commitment???
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:of course  fully aspirational...  BUT  there is often a 
> hard stop required
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:use ICANN Meetings  for main points...
>   Michael R. Graham:My thought is  2 years to get to point of drafting final 
> report.
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:makes  sense
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Yes  thus Initial Repoet  for June 14
>   Marika Konings:Note that the GNSO always meets with ccNSO and GAC at ICANN 
> meetings as well, so there is always that opportunity as well to provide an 
> update
>   Marika Konings:First deadline for input is 31 October, so that will also be 
> a good demonstration on how broad the interest in this topic is (or not ;-)
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:thus  oportunity  for garner inoout and ownership of 
> outcomes
>   Marika Konings:Many groups have said that they are interested in this 
> topic, but that does not necessarily translate into concrete input / feedback 
> (unless there is disagreement with the proposed recommendations)
>   Amr Elsadr:That sounds like a good idea.
>   Amr Elsadr:That also sounds like a good idea.
>   Amr Elsadr:Yes.
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:Frame work and guidance (II & III) match as well
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:but  iN  can  be with  II & III  or stand alone  IMO\
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:O & V  are committee of the whole\
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr: I had  i& III coupled
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr: at first as well  I  must  say
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr: but  iV   I had  stanf alone   (it need not be of 
> course)
>   Marika Konings:Of course, at the end of the day, all of these are very 
> closely related ;-)
>   Amr Elsadr:This is a clear example how deliverables are interdependant!! :)
>   Marika Konings:@Amr - and that is why it will be so important to keep open 
> lines between any possible sub-teams and the WG as a whole
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:things need to be woven indeed
>   Marika Konings:and maybe at some time the sub-teams may decide that 
> everything does need to be merged together
>   Amr Elsadr:@Marika..., I agree. I expect it to be tricky. I assume there 
> will be a lot of back-tracking on STs. Some discussions that will need to 
> take place on the full WG list and calls too.
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:I expect so Amr
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr:All good  thanks
>   Mary Wong:Thanks all, bye for now!
>   Amr Elsadr:Thanks everyone. Apologies about being so late one last time.
>  
>